Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (6) TMI 440

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appellant M/s. Canara Bank (Erstwhile M/s. Syndicate Bank) provided Banking and Other Financial Services, Business Support Services, Commercial Training or Coaching services etc. On verification of their ST-3 returns, it was found that they had utilised cenvat credit of Rs.3,78,00,541/- which was held to be irregular and hence, notice was issued. The original authority vide Order-in-Original No.04/2009 dated 04.03.2009 held that the appellant was ineligible for the CENVAT credit of Rs.2,92,47,275/-. The appellant filed an appeal against the above order and the Tribunal vide Final Order No.02/2010 dated 07.12.2009 allowed the appeal by way of remand. During the denovo proceedings, the Commissioner after examining various documents and based ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....whether the appellant is eligible for various input services as claimed by the appellant. The Tribunal vide Final Order No. 02/2010 dated 07.12.2009 in the first round of litigation observed as follows : "6. On a careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides and perused the records produced before us, we find that the entire demand of Rs.2,92,47,275/ has arisen only on the ground that the appellant was not able to give break up of the head "other charges". We find that the adjudicating authority has come to such a conclusion for denial of Cenvat credit on the ground that the appellant has not produced any breakup and detailed explanation. The adjudicating authority should have considered the issue after going through the evi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot provided 11 Excess credit availed 9,83,864 Excess credit 12 Security charges 12,39,677 Ineligible input 13 Hire charges for vehicle/generator 379 Ineligible input 14 General Repairs 978 Ineligible input 15 Concurrent audit fee 86,999 Ineligible input 16 Professional charges 5,279 Ineligible input 17 Rent 55,748 Ineligible input   Total 97,24,249   6.1 We find that at paragraph 24 of the impugned order, the Commissioner observed as follows: "I find that they have furnished audited certificates of service tax paid statements from their Regional offices and other related offices such as........The audited statements furnished by the service provider in respect of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....med by the appellants are admissible for credit for rendering output services, we find that Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka has observed that - "There cannot be any quarrel regarding the said proposition of law. As stated therein, the definition of input service is more exhaustive than input. Whether it is input or output service there should be nexus or integral connection with the manufacture of final products as well as the business activity. At the same time, because of the exhaustive definition of input service, the scope of nexus or integral connection is also explained and in fact is specifically provided. Therefore to find out whether there is a nexus or integral connection with the manufacturer of final products. We have to keep....