2025 (5) TMI 2046

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri Mukesh Jain, CIT (DR) ORDER PER SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as 'CIT(A)'] dated 21/11/2024 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2008-09. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Hence, the impugned penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, is absolutely erroneous, incorrect and bad-in-law and needs to be deleted. 3. Without prejudice to the aforesaid ground of appeal no. 2, even otherwise on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A), NFAC has grossly erred in confirming the penalty at Rs. 1,53,834/u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act in respect of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....730/- has been confirmed out of total addition made by the lower authorities of Rs. 5,12,779/-. Even the minor addition of Rs. 36,730/- has been confirmed, only on estimated basis, by applying Gross Profit (GP) rate in respect of deficit in the quantity of goods/cloth sent by the assessee for the job-work against the goods/cloth received from job-workers holding the same was not fully explained. I....