<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2046 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771774</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the surviving addition in quantum proceedings was made only on estimation and did not establish concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. On those facts, deliberate concealment was not shown, so the penalty was not exigible and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2046 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771774</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the surviving addition in quantum proceedings was made only on estimation and did not establish concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. On those facts, deliberate concealment was not shown, so the penalty was not exigible and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>