Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (7) TMI 1631

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed back to the desk of Hon. CIT for reconsideration. (iii) Without prejudice to the above, The Learned Assessing Officer is not correct in holding agriculture land as Capital Asset and not correct in adding sum of Rs. 52,41,028/- as Long Term Capital Gain on Sale of Agriculture Land. (iv) Without prejudice to the above, the Learned Assessing Officer is also not correct to disallow claim of section 54B of the Act as the assessee has purchased Agriculture Land within two years." 3. The facts of the case are that assessment u/s 147 of the Act was framed in the case of the assessee, noting that the assessee had sold an immovable property (land) for Rs.57,55,000/- and no return of income had been filed by the assessee. The assessee's explanation that the land sold by it was not a capital asset being rural agricultural land was rejected by the Assessing Officer. The assessee's alternate contention that he was entitled to benefit of exemption u/s 54B of the Act for investing the capital gains so earned in the purchase of another agricultural land was also rejected by the Assessing Officer and in turn Long Term Capital Gain earned by the assessee was computed by the As....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....2 of his order that return of income in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act on 15.04.2022 had been filed by the assessee. He, therefore, stated that admittedly the assessee had filed his return of income and the first condition for invoking the provisions of Section 249(4)(b) of the Act, therefore, was not satisfied. 7.2 He, thereafter, stated that the ld. CIT(A) had found the assessee to have not paid advance tax considering the assessed income of the assessee noting the provisions of section 234B of the Act, while the liability for payment of advance tax had was to be determined in terms of Section 209 of the Act. 7.3 He drew our attention to the order of the ld. CIT(A) at paragraph No.3.3, wherein he had referred to the provisions of Section 234B(1) of the Act and Section 208 of the Act, and held that the assessee's liability to pay advance tax was to be determined in terms of its assessed income, and since the liability of tax to be paid by the assessee on his assessed income amounted to approximately Rs.11 lakhs, the assessee was liable to pay advance tax. Our attention was drawn to paragraph Nos. 3.3 to 4 of his order as under:- "3.3. As per provisions of se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessee during that year, as computed in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter, is one thousand five hundred rupees or more. 3.5. Though the appellant has not offered 'YES' comments at sl. No. 9 of Form- 35, it was asked vide DIN & letter no. ITBA/NFAC/F/APL_1/2023- 24/1057762204(1) dated 07.11.2023 to intimate whether it has made payment of tax-which includes element of advance tax also in compliance to notice of demand u/s 156 of the Act and date of compliance was fixed for 15.11.2023 but the appellant failed to contradict the information given at sl. no. 9 of Form- 35 and to prove that it has made payment of amount equal to the advance tax which was due on its income. It is, therefore, clear that information, given at sl. no. 9 of Form-35 is correct and the appellant has not made payment of amount equal to the advance tax which was due on its income. 4. Since the appellant has not filed return of income as well as not paid an amount equal to the amount of advance tax which was payable by it, present appeal is not liable to be admitted. The appeal is infructuous and is, therefore, dismissed. 8. The ld. Counsel for the assessee pointed o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x was found to be short paid to the extent of 90% of the assessed tax, the assessee was liable to pay simple interest on the shortfall. Our attention was drawn to the provisions of Section 234B of the Act as under:- "234B. (1) Subject to the other provisions of this section, where, in any financial year, an assessee who is liable to pay advance tax under section 208 has failed to pay such tax or, where the advance tax paid by such assessee under the provisions of section 210 is less than ninety per cent of the assessed tax, the assessee shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of one per cent for every month or part of a month comprised in the period from the 1st day of April next following such financial year to the date of determination of total income under sub-section (1) of section 143 and where a regular assessment is made, to the date of such regular assessment, on an amount equal to the assessed tax or, as the case may be, on the amount by which the advance tax paid as aforesaid falls short of the assessed tax. 9.1 It was contended, therefore, that in terms of the provisions of Section 234B of the Act also the assessed tax was not the basis for arrivin....