2025 (3) TMI 1180
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Sanyal ... ... for the State ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner received a draft assessment order on 30th June, 2017 and filed an appeal before the respondent no.3 on 21st September, 2017 against the order of assessment. At the time of filing the appeal, the petitioner was unable to pay 15 per cent of the tax in dispute, as required under the Statut....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....). It was observed in the order that since the petitioner was similarly situated to that of M/s. Vatech Wabag Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Midnapur Charge & Ors., it would be appropriate to permit the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the order of assessment within four weeks from the date of the order, subject to the petitioner fulfilling all other conditions for preferring....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... whether the outstanding demand had been paid, or was pending before the Board/ Hon'ble Tribunal/ Hon'ble High Court or Supreme Court. On receipt of the said email the petitioner made several attempts to contact the learned Advocate who filed the writ petition being WP No.2231 (W) of 2018 to ascertain the status of the case. Since the petitioner could not get any updates on the matter or the resu....