<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1180 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767794</link>
    <description>Where a statutory appeal has already been filed and the required pre-deposit has been made, the appellate authority may be directed to entertain the appeal and decide it on merits. The Court treated the completed deposit as satisfying the procedural prerequisite and issued an administrative direction to consider the appeal within a fixed time. The practical effect was to secure consideration of the statutory appeal rather than any determination on the underlying tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:50:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1180 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767794</link>
      <description>Where a statutory appeal has already been filed and the required pre-deposit has been made, the appellate authority may be directed to entertain the appeal and decide it on merits. The Court treated the completed deposit as satisfying the procedural prerequisite and issued an administrative direction to consider the appeal within a fixed time. The practical effect was to secure consideration of the statutory appeal rather than any determination on the underlying tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>