2024 (12) TMI 395

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Petitioner : Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vikas Arora, Adv. Mr. Naman Tondon, Adv. Mr. Rupinder Sinhmar , Adv For the Respondent : Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr. Tushar Singh, Adv. For M/s. Lawyer S Knit & Co , AOR ORDER 1. This petition is at the instance of the Revenue seeking to question the legality and validity of the order passed by the High Court date....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eized during the search from residence of Principal Trustee of assessee society? (ii) whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was right holding that violation of conditions under Section 13(1)(c) would not result in denial of exemption on the whole income and denial be restricted to the income in violation of provisions of Section 13(1)(c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aw, referred to above. 5. In such circumstances, the Revenue is here before this Court. 6. It is not in dispute that the Income Tax Appeal No.1454/2017 is pending for final hearing. 7. The High Court seems to have declined to admit the appeal on the second substantial question of law as proposed by the Revenue, on the premise that the same is covered by Finance Act, 1984, Circular No.387 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the appeal on the second question of law, as proposed by the Revenue. 11. As the Income Tax Appeal No.1454/2017 has already been admitted on one substantial question of law, it will be in fitness of things if the High Court also looks into the second question of law as proposed by the Revenue, more particularly when it has been vociferously submitted that Circular No.387/6.7.1984 is not applica....