Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (11) TMI 301

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n respect of the assessment of 13 Bills of Entry, but the Revenue has filed only one appeal. 2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the importer/assessee/respondent M/s Goel Overseas had imported Aluminum Scrap of various grades vide impugned 13 Bills of Entry at ICD Panchi Gujara, Gannaur, Sonepat, Haryana. The said Bills of Entry were assessed at enhanced value which was accepted by the importer/assessee/respondent. However, later on, the importer filed appeals before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) against the assessment of 13 Bills of Entry with enhanced value. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order allowed the appeal filed by the importer/assessee against the assessment and set aside the enhanced value ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tary threshold below which appeals cannot be filed by the department before the CESTAT, the High Court and the Supreme Court. In support of his submissions, the learned Counsel relied upon the following case-laws: * Commissioner of CGST & CE, Jammu vs. M/s Narbada Industries - CEA No. 10 of 2020, order passed by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir on 23.05.2022 * CMR Nikkie India Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad - 2021 (6) TMI 270 CESTAT Ahmedabad * Ekantika Copiers (P) Ltd vs. Collector of Central Excise - 1991 (3) TMI 164 CEGAT New Delhi (LB of 5 Judges) 4.3 He further submits that the department is wrongly justifying the maintainability of the present appeals by relying upon the Interim/Miscellaneous Order passed by th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lls of entry, shipping bills, refund claims/demands, letters or declarations dealt with in the decision or order appealed against, it shall suffice for purposes of these rules that the appellant files one Memorandum of Appeal against the order or decision of the authority below, along with such number of copies thereof as provided in rule 9" Explanation - (1) In a case where the impugned order-in-appeal has been passed with reference to more than one orders-in-original, the Memoranda of Appeal filed as per Rules 6 shall be as many as the number of the orders-in-original to which the case relates in so far as the appellant is concerned. (2) In case an impugned order is in respect of more than one person, each aggrieved person will be r....