https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761315 CESTAT Chandigarh held that Revenue's single appeal against 13 Bills of Entry was not maintainable. The tribunal ruled that when multiple order-in-original are passed, separate appeals must be filed for each order under Rule 6(A). Since Commissioner (Appeals) passed a common order covering 13 Bills of Entry, Revenue was required to file 13 separate appeals challenging each Bill of Entry as individual assessment orders. The appeal was dismissed, directing Revenue to file 13 appeals if advised. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:58:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761315 CESTAT Chandigarh held that Revenue's single appeal against 13 Bills of Entry was not maintainable. The tribunal ruled that when multiple order-in-original are passed, separate appeals must be filed for each order under Rule 6(A). Since Commissioner (Appeals) passed a common order covering 13 Bills of Entry, Revenue was required to file 13 separate appeals challenging each Bill of Entry as individual assessment orders. The appeal was dismissed, directing Revenue to file 13 appeals if advised. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761315