Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (11) TMI 167

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... DR ORDER PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.: 1. The appeal in ITA No.1254/Del/2024 for AY 2017-18, arises out of the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as 'ld. NFAC', in short] in Appeal No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1060673738(1) dated 08.02.2024 against the order of assessment passed u/s 270 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 't....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nternally generated software and claimed depreciation @60% thereon in the return of income. The ld AO in the assessment considered the internally generated software to fall under the ambit of intangible assets thereby eligible for depreciation only @25% as against @60% claimed by the assessee. Accordingly, the ld AO disallowed the excess depreciation of Rs. 1,54,37,173/- in the assessment. This as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent rate had arose only due to difference in interpretation by the ld AO by not agreeing to the contention of the assessee. Ultimately this is only disallowance of a claim made by the assessee. There cannot be any allegation of either underreporting or misreporting of income. There is no concealment on the part of the assessee as all the details relevant for adjudication of the issue had been duly....