<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 167 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761181</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the AO. The tribunal concluded there was no underreporting or misreporting of income, as the discrepancy arose from differing interpretations. The decision emphasized full disclosure by the assessee and relied on established Supreme Court judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 167 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761181</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the AO. The tribunal concluded there was no underreporting or misreporting of income, as the discrepancy arose from differing interpretations. The decision emphasized full disclosure by the assessee and relied on established Supreme Court judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>