2024 (10) TMI 1595

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hav Rajeev for M/s. Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan Attorneys For the Respondents: Mr. C.Harsha Raj, AGP (T) ORDER An assessment order dated 21.12.2023 is assailed by the petitioner primarily on the ground that expenditure incurred by the petitioner towards price difference was treated as taxable supply under the applicable GST enactments. Pursuant to an audit and the issuance of an audit re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the respondents. He submits that the petitioner should have placed all relevant documents in order to establish that the price difference was not liable to tax under applicable GST enactments. He further submits that the adjudication of this issue entails examination of disputed questions of fact. Since a statutory remedy is available to the petitioner, he submits that discretionary jurisdiction s....