https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760996 Writ interference under Article 226 was declined where the tax demand depended on disputed facts and supporting documents, making the matter unsuitable for factual reappraisal in writ proceedings. The court noted that a statutory appellate remedy remained available and that the petitioner was still within the condonable period for appeal, so the assessment order was left undisturbed and the petitioner was relegated to the appeal mechanism. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 18:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760996 Writ interference under Article 226 was declined where the tax demand depended on disputed facts and supporting documents, making the matter unsuitable for factual reappraisal in writ proceedings. The court noted that a statutory appellate remedy remained available and that the petitioner was still within the condonable period for appeal, so the assessment order was left undisturbed and the petitioner was relegated to the appeal mechanism. Case-Laws GST Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760996