2024 (10) TMI 668
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... S. Durairaj For the Respondent : Mr. G. Nanmaran, SGP ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the proceedings of the respondent dated 25.4.2024 passed under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 2017. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader accepting notice for the respondent. 3. The cas....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....10,72,818/- towards tax due, interest and penalty. 5. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that notice was issued, that though sufficient opportunity was given, the petitioner did not avail the opportunity. and that therefore, the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality. Consequently, he has sought for dismissal of this writ petition. 6. In....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ccasion to deal with a similar issue in W.P. No.26477 of 2024 dated 12.9.2024. This Court wanted to afford an opportunity to the petitioner therein by putting the petitioner on terms. In order to maintain consistency, a similar order can be passed in this writ petition also. 9. In the light of the above discussions, the impugned order passed by the respondent in Reference No. ZD330424200278R/20....
TaxTMI