<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760069</link>
    <description>In a tax assessment under Section 73 based on a GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B mismatch, the Court treated the disputed receipt of notice and alleged denial of effective hearing as sufficient to interfere with the order. To ensure fair adjudication and consistency with a similar matter, it set aside the assessment and directed a fresh consideration on condition that the petitioner first pay 10% of the demand. The petitioner was then to file objections, after which fresh notice, a personal hearing, and a speaking order were to follow.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 22:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760069</link>
      <description>In a tax assessment under Section 73 based on a GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B mismatch, the Court treated the disputed receipt of notice and alleged denial of effective hearing as sufficient to interfere with the order. To ensure fair adjudication and consistency with a similar matter, it set aside the assessment and directed a fresh consideration on condition that the petitioner first pay 10% of the demand. The petitioner was then to file objections, after which fresh notice, a personal hearing, and a speaking order were to follow.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>