Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (10) TMI 478

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....owing grounds of appeal: "1. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of the Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in making addition of Rs. 18,86,850/- on account of excess fair market value as given in the Valuation Report over the purchase consideration treated as alleged income from other sources u/s 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as the law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of the Income Tax (Appeals) has not offered adequate opportunities to hear the case and passed ex-parte order and hence the case may please be set aside and restore back ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the income of assessee. The contents of show cause notice are recorded in para 6 of assessment order. The Assessing Officer recorded that assessee is in reply show cause notice stated that fair market value of said land may be considered at Rs. 43,86,850/- as per valuation report of District Valuation Officer (DVO). The Assessing Officer accordingly brought the difference of Rs. 18,86,850/- (43,86,850 - 25,00,000) to taxation and added under section 56(2)(x) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved by the addition in the assessment order, the assessee filed appeal before Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of Assessing Officer by holding that Assessing Officer adopted the value of asset as per report of DVO. The Assessing Officer is right in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r square meter rate of comparable are ranging from Rs. 126/- to Rs. 222/- per square meter. However, the DVO has adopted / suggested rate at Rs. 155/- per square meter. The Ld. AR submits that value estimated by DVO is on higher side and keeping in view the location and size of the land. The assessee purchased the land as per market rate. Though, the report of DVO is binding on the Assessing Officer, however, the appellate authority may differ with his report. The value of impugned land may be considered at the rate of sale consideration recorded in the sale deed. To support of his contention, the Ld. AR relied upon the following decisions: * Nitinkumar Manubhai Patel vs. ITO, ITA No.354/SRT/2024 (ITAT - Surat) * Sanjay Ja....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f fair market value as on the date of sale of asset. The assessee has shown sale consideration at the rate of Rs. 88/- per square meter on purchase of piece of land admeasuring 28,302. Since the DVO / Sub-Register Office valued the land at Rs. 62,26,000/-, thus, there was a difference vis-à-vis the sale consideration shown by assessee and the value asset determined by Stamp Registration Authority for the purpose of registration of land. I find that during the assessment, a reference was made by Assessing Officer was estimation of fair market value of land. Though, the Assessing Officer has not expressly mentioned about such reference in assessment order. The DVO furnished his report dated 24.03.2021. The DVO estimated the value of la....