TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT reduces fair market value from Rs. 155 to Rs. 150 per square meter under section 56(2)(x) for excess value addition computation.</h1> The ITAT Surat reduced the fair market value determination under section 56(2)(x) from Rs. 155 per square meter to Rs. 150 per square meter for computing ... Income from other sources u/s 56(2)(x) - Addition on account of excess fair market value as given in the Valuation Report over the purchase consideration - estimation of fair market value as on the date of sale of asset - HELD THAT:- The comparable instances narrated by DVO relates to the same village, however, there is a difference of about Rs. 94/- per square meter vis-à-vis, the comparable of RS No.53 and RS No.3, which are shown at Rs. 126.16 per square meter and Rs. 220.04 per square meter respectively. No doubt, the DVO has adopted Rs. 155/- per square meter as on 15.09.2017. Though, average of four comparables instances is Rs. 163.36 per square meter. Considering the difference in various comparable instances relied by DVO, in my considered view, Rs. 150/- per square meter would be reasonable and sufficient to meet the end of justice. Thus, direct the AO to adopt Rs. 150/- per square meter and compute the addition accordingly. Ground No.1 of the appeal is partly allowed. Issues:1. Valuation of immovable property for income tax assessment.2. Application of section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act.3. Adequacy of opportunities provided during the assessment process.4. Consideration of objection before the District Valuation Officer.5. Comparison of fair market value estimated by DVO with market rate.Analysis:Issue 1: Valuation of immovable property for income tax assessmentThe case involved the valuation of agricultural land purchased by the assessee, with a significant difference between the sale consideration declared by the assessee and the value determined by the Stamp Valuation Authority. The Assessing Officer invoked section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, considering the difference as income from other sources. The dispute primarily revolved around the fair market value of the land at the time of sale.Issue 2: Application of section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax ActBoth the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the addition to the income of the assessee under section 56(2)(x) of the Act, based on the valuation report of the District Valuation Officer. The Tribunal had to determine the correctness of this application of the provision in light of the facts and circumstances of the case.Issue 3: Adequacy of opportunities provided during the assessment processThe assessee raised concerns regarding the adequacy of opportunities to present their case before the authorities, alleging an ex-parte order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). However, the Tribunal did not find any merit in this argument and proceeded to evaluate the substantive issues raised by the assessee.Issue 4: Consideration of objection before the District Valuation OfficerThe Tribunal considered the objections raised by the assessee before the District Valuation Officer, highlighting discrepancies in the valuation report prepared by the DVO. The Tribunal analyzed the details provided by the assessee and assessed the impact of these objections on the fair market value determination.Issue 5: Comparison of fair market value estimated by DVO with market rateThe Tribunal deliberated on the fair market value estimated by the District Valuation Officer, considering the location, size, and nature of the land. After reviewing the arguments presented by both parties and relevant case laws, the Tribunal adjusted the fair market value estimation to Rs. 150 per square meter, differing from the DVO's valuation. This adjustment led to a partial allowance of the assessee's appeal, providing relief in the computation of the addition based on the revised fair market value.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, adjusting the fair market value estimation and directing the Assessing Officer to compute the addition accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of fair valuation in income tax assessments and the need for a thorough evaluation of all relevant factors in determining the fair market value of immovable property.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
