Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (5) TMI 539

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n ORDER 1. Heard Shri Mahendra Singh, counsel for the appellant and Dr. Shamsuddin, DLA for the respondent. In the order under appeal a penalty of Rs. 2.50 lakhs has been imposed on the appellant and Rs. 7 lakhs seized from the scooter of the appellant has been ordered to be confiscated. The appellant, according to case of the Enforcement was intercepted on 18-4-1990 by the officers of Enfor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... also gave details of Mohsin Gavai who was school friend of the appellant from school days. Mohsin Gavai of Muscal engaged the appellant on commission. He also further stated that persons came to his home to collect payment by producing slip wherein some code number was written. Details of the payment to 5 persons were also given in the statement, loose sheets were explained. It appears that on 20....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....haran Kurmi v. State of Bihar AIR 1964 SC 1184 whereas Dr. Shamsuddin has placed reliance on Naresh J. Sukhwani v. Union of India 1996 SCC (Cri.) 76 wherein Hon'ble Supreme Court held that statement of co-accused making inculpatory statement against himself and another co-accused is admissible against the co-accused. This decision is under Customs Act but the ratio of the decision can be applied i....