<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 539 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457723</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the imposition of a Rs. 2.5 lakh penalty on the appellant and ordered the confiscation of Rs. 1 lakh from the seized Rs. 7 lakhs. The remaining Rs. 3,50,000 was to be refunded within six months. The appellant was linked to hawala transactions, and the Tribunal found no error in the original order despite the appellant&#039;s retraction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 539 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457723</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the imposition of a Rs. 2.5 lakh penalty on the appellant and ordered the confiscation of Rs. 1 lakh from the seized Rs. 7 lakhs. The remaining Rs. 3,50,000 was to be refunded within six months. The appellant was linked to hawala transactions, and the Tribunal found no error in the original order despite the appellant&#039;s retraction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>