AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (3) TMI 1525
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(Technical) Ms. Pallavi Ganesh, Advocate for the Appellant Shri S. Balakumar, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per M. Ajit Kumar, These appeals are filed by M/s. Greaves Cotton Ltd. against the Order in Appeal No. 147/2013 MIV), No. 116/2013 (MII) and 117/2013 (MII) dated 26.3.2013. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellants are manufacturers of IC Engines, Power Driven Pum....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... are before us. 3. The learned counsel Ms. Pallavi Ganesh appeared and argued for the appellant. She has contended that the appellant is not the manufacturer of the waste and scrap and therefore there is no liability on the appellant to pay the duty on the waste and scrap manufactured at the job worker's end. Further, the provision of Rule 4(5)(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 nowhere states....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the ground that it is the principal manufacturer who is required to pay duty on the waste and scrap arising in the job workers factory and not returned by them to the factory of the principal manufacturer. I find that the issue is no more res integra. An identical issue was considered by the Tribunal in the case of Rocket Engineering Corporation Ltd. Vs. CCE, Pune 2006 (193) ELT 33 (Tri.-Mum.), la....