Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (7) TMI 769

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... consignment covered by Bill of Lading No.SAFM 769367756, dated 19.01.2017, have been held to be confiscable and the petitioner has been imposed with penalty of Rs. 10,00,000/- under Section 112(a)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The operative portion of the impugned order reads as under:- ''(i) I hold that 1,82,066 Kgs. of imported "Soya Beans" valued at Rs. 47,18,750/- (appraised value by the CE) covered under B/L No. SAFM 769367756 dated 19.01.2017 are liable to confiscation. Since the goods are not available, they are not confiscated. (ii) I impose a penalty of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) on M/s. Shanthi Feeds Pvt Ltd., under Section 112(a)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962.'' 3. The impugned orde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Food Safety and Standards (Packing and Labelling) Regulation, 2011, was without any merits, as the imported goods itself were destroyed as unclaimed cargo pursuant to letter dated 25.07.2018 of the third respondent addressed to the Manager, M/s.Hari CFS, Tuticorin. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would also draw the attention to Section 46 of the Customs Act, 1962. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that only the importer of any goods is required to file a Bill of Entry. In this case, admittedly, no documents were given to the petitioner and therefore, the petitioner is not an importer for the purpose of Section 46 of the Customs Act, 1962. Consequently, the impugned proceed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ying as longstanding at CFS.'' Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner's claim that they are only the notified party cannot be accepted and they are not the consignee of the goods imported under Bill of Lading No.769367756. The petitioner, in their reply to the show cause notice, dated 28.07.2018, stated that they relinquished the title "Notify Party" to allow the Customs Department to declare the imported cargo as an unclaimed cargo or to confiscate the goods and dispose of the goods. 9. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 10. No doubt, the petitioner would have had transactions with the shipper, namely, STE E....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... MAERSK LINE પુનઃ ધ ફોટા Catem House. Tuta Mare Pvt. Ltd. Alera House, He15/19 Peyneta gha Ce 1030-20117214 tone,+91-45)-4003508 09 201 SEVOTTAM Date: 09/02/18 To The Assistant Commissioner (Disposal), Customs House, Tuticorin-628 004 Dear Sir, Subject: Disposal of Unclaimed/Uncleared Cargo vide B/L Him, 769367736 Ref: C.No. Vill/25/101/2017-Disposal Date: 27.12.2017 & 24.01.2017 9/2 Please be inform you that subject Import shipment vide 8,1 no 79357756 with 8x 20 DRY containers had arrived in MV. Cape Nemo V.2365 on 17.02. "917 to Tuticorin BL was released with the below name and manifest was also filed in the name of the con....