<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 769 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755549</link>
    <description>HC quashed customs penalty order against petitioner involving Soya Beans consignment. Court found jurisdictional error in invoking Customs Act sections and lack of conclusive evidence establishing importer status. Penalty order was invalidated due to incomplete transaction documentation and procedural irregularities, providing relief to the petitioner under Section 128 of Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 769 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755549</link>
      <description>HC quashed customs penalty order against petitioner involving Soya Beans consignment. Court found jurisdictional error in invoking Customs Act sections and lack of conclusive evidence establishing importer status. Penalty order was invalidated due to incomplete transaction documentation and procedural irregularities, providing relief to the petitioner under Section 128 of Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>