Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

The court allowed appeal despite 1100-day delay due to practitioner's misunderstanding. Justice prevails as ex-parte order set aside.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The ITAT considered the condonation of a 1100-day delay in filing an appeal, noting that the delay resulted from the income tax practitioner's mistaken belief that the order was not appealable. Citing the principle that "sufficient cause" should be liberally construed to advance justice, the ITAT referred to a Supreme Court case where a 1418-day delay was condoned due to unusual circumstances and misrepresentation by the advocate. The ITAT held that the ex-parte order by the PCIT violated natural justice as the assessee was not given a fair opportunity to present their case. Consequently, the order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the PCIT for fresh adjudication. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.....