2024 (6) TMI 1368
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....kwana, DR ORDER PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM: 01. This appeal is filed by Income Tax Officer, Ward 19(3)(1), Mumbai for A.Y. 2009-10, against the appellate order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [the learned CIT (A)] dated 8th November, 2023, wherein the appeal filed by the assessee against the reassessment order passed under Section 147 read with section 143(3) of the A....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l income of Rs. 1,11,091/-. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). 03. On the information received from DGIT (Investigation) on 26th December, 2013, it was communicated that assessee has made purchase of Rs. 42,32,703/- from 8 different parties, who are involved in providing bogus purchase bills. Notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued on 3rd....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng section 145(3) of the Act. After discussion he made the addition at the rate of 25% of such bogus purchases amounting to Rs. 10,58,175/- to the total income of the assessee computing the assessed income at Rs. 11,69,270/- by assessment order dated 4th March, 2015. 04. The assessee is aggrieved with the same preferred the appeal before the learned CIT (A), who after elaborate discussion follo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 06. We have carefully considered the rival contentions and perused the orders of the lower authorities. Undoubtedly, the assessee could not prove the genuineness of the purchases which are found in the information received from the DGIT Investigation. However, the purchase of Rs. 42,32,703, were shown by the assessee by a chart showing that the purchases from these parties have also gone into sa....
TaxTMI