<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1368 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Income Tax Officer&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objection, directing the Assessing Officer to calculate the income addition based on the difference in gross profit from tainted versus untainted purchases. The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment, emphasizing the need for accurate determination of income additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 09:02:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1368 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Income Tax Officer&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objection, directing the Assessing Officer to calculate the income addition based on the difference in gross profit from tainted versus untainted purchases. The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment, emphasizing the need for accurate determination of income additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>