Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Revision u/s 263: Tribunal rules in favor of depreciation claim on goodwill and Trade name. Assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving revision u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act regarding depreciation claim on goodwill and intangible assets. The Principal Commissioner believed the depreciation claimed was disallowed. The Tribunal found that the goodwill arose post-amalgamation and its valuation was supported by a report approved by the National Company Law Tribunal. A Supreme Court precedent supported the depreciation claim. The Tribunal also addressed a disallowance issue, determining that the error didn't lead to revenue loss. Citing the Paville Projects case, the Tribunal concluded that the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue, ruling in favor of the assessee.....