2024 (6) TMI 742

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY For the Petitioner : Mrs.V.Vijayalakshmi For the R1 : Mr. V. Prashanth Kiran, Govt. Adv. (T) ORDER By these four writ petitions, orders in original pertaining to assessment periods 2017-2018 to 2020-2021 are challenged on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demands on merits. 2. The petitione....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ders impugned herein, the bank account of the petitioner was attached and a sum of Rs.4,44,025/- was appropriated therefrom. According to her, this amount would cover a substantial portion of 10% of the disputed tax demand. On instructions, she submits that the petitioner would make good the short fall between the amount appropriated and 10% of the disputed tax demand. 4. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, le....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... demands on merits. 6. For reasons aforesaid, the impugned orders are set aside subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand in respect of each assessment period as agreed to after giving credit to the sum of Rs.4,44,025/- appropriated from the petitioner's bank account. Such remittance shall be made within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt o....