<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 742 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754135</link>
    <description>Tax dispute involving man power supply services. HC found procedural irregularities in assessment orders, setting aside original demands while requiring petitioner to deposit 10% of disputed tax. Court mandated respondent provide reasonable opportunity for contesting tax demands, including personal hearing, and issue fresh orders within three months. Bank attachment was lifted. Writ petitions disposed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 742 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754135</link>
      <description>Tax dispute involving man power supply services. HC found procedural irregularities in assessment orders, setting aside original demands while requiring petitioner to deposit 10% of disputed tax. Court mandated respondent provide reasonable opportunity for contesting tax demands, including personal hearing, and issue fresh orders within three months. Bank attachment was lifted. Writ petitions disposed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>