Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 662

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HON'BLE MR. CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Appearance:- For the Appellant : Mr. Debasish Ghosh Mr. T.A. Khan Mr. B. Sengupta. For the Union of India : Mr. Prabir Kr. Bhowmik Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee.   For the respondent CGST & CX Authority : Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee Mr. Abhradip Maity. JUDGMENT (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) In R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... challenge to the adjudication order dated 16th October, 2023 was rejected directing the appellant to prefer an appeal against the adjudication order. 5. After elaborately hearing the learned advocates for the parties, we find that the adjudicating authority has not caused any verification of the genuineness at the supplier's end. According to the appellant, who is the purchaser, he has the val....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pportunity to the appellant to go before the adjudicating authority to first prove the movement of goods pursuant to the tax invoice, which was issued to the appellant. 7. If the appellant is able to successfully prove the same, then and then only the adjudicating authority should investigate from the supplier's end. 8. For the above reasons, the appeal and the connected application are disp....