<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 662 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754055</link>
    <description>HC allowed condonation of delay in appeal. Appellant directed to prove goods movement and transaction genuineness through documentary evidence. Adjudicating authority will verify supplier-side documentation. If movement is established, input tax credit may be granted; otherwise, original order stands. Case remanded for further investigation and verification of submitted documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 662 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754055</link>
      <description>HC allowed condonation of delay in appeal. Appellant directed to prove goods movement and transaction genuineness through documentary evidence. Adjudicating authority will verify supplier-side documentation. If movement is established, input tax credit may be granted; otherwise, original order stands. Case remanded for further investigation and verification of submitted documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>