Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 591

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant Shri R. Rajaraman , Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER Per Ms. Sulekha Beevi. C. S Brief facts are that on the basis of intelligence gathered that unscrupulous exporters are misusing the drawback benefit by fraudulent exports, the Customs officers attached to the Air Cargo Unit of the Air Commissionerate, intercepted two export consignment on 08.09.2005 at the Air Carg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....15,620/-. The employee of the CHA informed that the examination of cargo was already over and that they were waiting for report. The officers opened the packages. It was found that the packages contained only torn/used/soiled shoe uppers. As the item found in the consignment was not as per the declaration, the officers opened and examined all the 64 cartons one by one in the presence of witnesses ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ther, 292 of the impugned order was adverted to by the Ld. Counsel to submit that the allegation made against the appellant is mainly that the appellant had kept blank documents in the office at Coimbatore and Tirupur which facilitated the employee to file the shipping bills in order to claim drawback. There is no allegation in the SCN or in the OIO that the appellant had directly involved in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o-noticee in the proceedings has considered the issue in detail and reduced the penalty from Rs.3,00,000/- to Rs.75,000/-. In the said decision the Tribunal observed that there is no allegation that the appellant themselves have benefited from any part of the drawback fraudulently obtained by the main operators/exporters. The relevant para of the decision of the Tribunal is reproduced as under:- ....