<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 591 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order, reducing the penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) from Rs.3,00,000 to Rs.75,000 under Section 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962. The decision considered the absence of direct benefit to the CHA from the fraudulent activities, aligning with a precedent. The appeal was partly allowed, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 591 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order, reducing the penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) from Rs.3,00,000 to Rs.75,000 under Section 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962. The decision considered the absence of direct benefit to the CHA from the fraudulent activities, aligning with a precedent. The appeal was partly allowed, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>