Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (5) TMI 1174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....langes falling under Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 were denied on the ground that these items are neither 'capital goods' nor 'inputs' in terms of Rule 2(a) and Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 respectively. 1.1. The period of dispute in the present case is 2006-09 whereas the Show Cause Notice in the instant case has been issued on 09.02.2012 by invoking the extended period of limitation. 2. After hearing the parties, we find that the appellant has been able to show the usage of the said items in fabrication of their capital goods, without which no manufacturing activity can take place. The same is supported by the certificate issued by a Chartered Engineer. 2.1. Moreover, we find that during the impugned p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cited as precedent or as relied upon by the Tribunal in different other matters. The Gujarat High Court in Mundra Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd. - 2015 (39) S.T.R. 726 (Guj.) referred to the contents of the amendment, to the extent it is relevant for the purpose of this case and held as follows : "We do not find that amendment made in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 which come into force on 7-7-2009 was clarificatory amendment as there is nothing to suggest in the Amending Act that amendment made in Explanation 2 was clarificatory in nature. Wherever the Legislature wants to clarify the provision, it clearly mentions intention in the notification itself and seeks to clarify existing provision. Even, if the new provision is added then it....