https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753121 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order denying CENVAT Credit on steel items. It held that the extended period of limitation was inapplicable, and the steel items qualified as inputs or capital goods under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, with no order as to costs, granting the appellant consequential relief. en-us Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 May 2024 08:31:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753121 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order denying CENVAT Credit on steel items. It held that the extended period of limitation was inapplicable, and the steel items qualified as inputs or capital goods under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, with no order as to costs, granting the appellant consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753121