Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1979 (10) TMI 37

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, M.P., Bhopal, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore, has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"): " Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 by the Additional Commissioner of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the provisions of s. 212(3) of the Act and that having failed to do so, the assessee was liable for penalty under the provisions of s. 273(b) as well as interest under s. 217 of the Act. The Addl. Commissioner after giving notice to the assessee and considering the objections of the assessee held that the order of the ITO was erroneous and was prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. The Addl.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n I.T.A. Nos. 1154/1970-71 and 1155 of 1970-71 in the case of Indian Pharmaceuticals v. Addl. CIT, wherein it was held that the Addl. Commissioner had no power to set aside the order of assessment and directing the ITO to start penalty proceedings under s. 273(b) of the Act. However, the earlier order of the Tribunal on which reliance was placed by the Tribunal in the present case came up for cons....