<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 37 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36672</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax had the jurisdiction to exercise powers under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the order of the Income Tax Officer was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, justifying the Addl. Commissioner&#039;s intervention. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty direction under section 273(b) was overturned, affirming the Addl. Commissioner&#039;s authority in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:09:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 37 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36672</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax had the jurisdiction to exercise powers under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the order of the Income Tax Officer was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, justifying the Addl. Commissioner&#039;s intervention. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty direction under section 273(b) was overturned, affirming the Addl. Commissioner&#039;s authority in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>