2018 (7) TMI 2334

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Appellant : Sitharama Murthy, Senior Counsel for V. Harish Kumar For the Respondents : Vedula Venkata Ramana, Senior Counsel for P. Sri Harsha Reddy JUDGMENT T.B. RADHAKRISHNAN, C.J. 1. This appeal is filed by BSE Limited (formerly, Bombay Stock Exchange Limited), which is the fourth respondent in Writ Petition No. 19753 of 2018, impeaching an interlocutory order passed by the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pany Law Tribunal and also to the authorities under Securities Exchange Board of India. The jurisdiction of the appellant to deal with the matters within its domain is also debated upon. 3. Ground No. 13 raised by the appellant in the Writ Appeal is, pointedly, that the decision to de-list the shares was taken by the appellant at Mumbai and the trading of the shares is also at Mumbai and suspen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ular person, particularly, the noticee, it would not be appropriate for the writ Court to deal with the matter as if the authority which issued such public notice has to face litigations in various High Courts of India, rather than confining such litigation to the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court within whose territorial limits, that authority is; and, from where that notice was issued. ....