https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311367 The HC determined it lacked territorial jurisdiction over the writ petition challenging the stock exchange's decision to de-list shares, as the decision-making and trading occurred in Mumbai. Consequently, the interlocutory order issued by a Single Judge was deemed unsustainable. The appeal by BSE Limited was allowed, vacating the previous order, and the writ petition was dismissed without prejudice to other issues. The Court closed any pending miscellaneous petitions and made no order regarding costs. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Dec 2023 21:01:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311367 The HC determined it lacked territorial jurisdiction over the writ petition challenging the stock exchange's decision to de-list shares, as the decision-making and trading occurred in Mumbai. Consequently, the interlocutory order issued by a Single Judge was deemed unsustainable. The appeal by BSE Limited was allowed, vacating the previous order, and the writ petition was dismissed without prejudice to other issues. The Court closed any pending miscellaneous petitions and made no order regarding costs. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311367