Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Revenue Department has no power to re-adjudicate or re-quantify Refund Order

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evenue Department has no power to re-adjudicate or re-quantify Refund Order<br>By: - Bimal jain<br>Value Added Tax - VAT and CST<br>Dated:- 20-12-2023<br><br>The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of GET AND D INDIA LIMITED VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) - 2023 (12) TMI 742 - MADRAS HIGH COURT directed the Revenue Department to refund the amount of tax as per refund order thereby holding that,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Notice cannot be issued when the excess tax amount has already been assessed and Revenue Department has passed the Refund Order. Also, the Revenue Department is not empowered to re-adjudicate or re-quantify while passing the Refund Order. Therefore, the Petitioner is entitled for the refund. Facts: M/s. GET and D India Limited ("the Petitioner") has filed a Writ Petition to quash the notic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e dated January 24, 2023 ("the Impugned Notice") and directing the Revenue Department ("the Respondent") to refund the excess tax amount, along with interest, under Section 42(5) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 as per assessment and refund order dated September 22, 2022 ("the Refund Order"). Issue: Whether the Revenue Department has the power to re-adjudicate or re-quantify Refund Or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der? Held: The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of GET AND D INDIA LIMITED VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) - 2023 (12) TMI 742 - MADRAS HIGH COURT held as under: * Noted that, the Refund Order was passed wherein the amount of excess tax with the Respondent was determined. Pursuant to the Refund Order passed, the Petitioner filed a refund application. The Respondent, after passing the Ref....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....und Order and filing the Refund Application, once again issued the Impugned Notice to the Petitioner and called for the particulars, as if to revise its order. * Opined that, the Impugned Notice cannot be issued when the excess tax amount has already been assessed and the Respondent has passed the Refund Order. Also, the Respondent is not empowered to re-adjudicate or re-quantify while passing ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Refund Order. Therefore, the Petitioner is entitled for the refund. * Held that, the Writ Petition is allowed. * Directed that, the Respondent should refund the amount as per the Refund Order along with interest. In case of non-compliance of the Order of the Court, the Respondent authorities shall before the Court. Author can be reached at [email protected])<br> Scholarly articles fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r knowledge sharing by authors, experts, professionals ....