Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2022 (2) TMI 1411

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....39 of Cr.P.C. for enlarging the petitioner on bail in a case in Complaint No.332 dated 27.09.2021 under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 132 of Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 132 of State(s) Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Section 20 of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and the petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2021. He submitted that as per the prosecution, they had collected some documents which had revealed that 6 entities registered as traders have passed on inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the tune of approximatel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ities and during the course of investigation it was revealed that there were four more entities being operated by the present petitioner in a similar manner and therefore, the petitioner was actively involved in 6 entities and has indulged in passing on the benefit of ITC without any supply of goods by issuing bogus/goodless invoices. Thereafter searches were conducted at registered premises belonging to these companies and it was found that the registered business premises of the two companies were vacant/closed for long and the companies were not operating from these premises and the present petitioner namely, Mr. Ravinder Baweja was not found to be residing at the registered address. Further inquiry revealed that apart from these two fir....