<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1411 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311318</link>
    <description>In a prosecution alleging fraudulent passing on of inadmissible input tax credit, the Court weighed the gravity of the offence, the substantial revenue loss and the fact that material witnesses remained unexamined. It accepted the apprehension that release at that stage could lead to witness influence or absconding, and therefore found regular bail not warranted. The petitioner was held not entitled to regular bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1411 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311318</link>
      <description>In a prosecution alleging fraudulent passing on of inadmissible input tax credit, the Court weighed the gravity of the offence, the substantial revenue loss and the fact that material witnesses remained unexamined. It accepted the apprehension that release at that stage could lead to witness influence or absconding, and therefore found regular bail not warranted. The petitioner was held not entitled to regular bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>