TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (5) TMI 1272
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r. Shashwat Singh, Adv., Mr. Pranjal Krishna, Adv., Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR, Ms. Pooja Dhar, AOR, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, AOR, Ms. Neeha Nagpal, Adv., Mr. Vishvendra Tomar, Adv., Ms. Sowjhanya Shankaran, Adv., Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Ld. ASG, Mr. Jayant K. Sud, ASG, Mr. Piyush Beniwal, Adv., Mr. S.N. Terdal, AOR, Mr. Rajneesh Chuni, Adv., Mr. Pankaj Singhal, Adv., Mr. Ayush Anand, Adv., Mr. Shakti Singh, Adv., Mr. Ayush Agrawal, Adv., Mr. Animesh Mishra, Adv., Mr. Parv. K. Garg, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv., Mr. Malik Javed Ansari, Adv., Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, AOR, Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. P.I. Jose, AOR, Mr. Jenis Francis, Adv., Mr. Ravi Sagar, Adv., Mr. Arjun Garg, Adv., Mr. Jayant K. Sug, ASG, Mr. Kartik Jasra, Adv., Ms. Ishika Farsaiya, Adv., Mr. Plannit Steffano, Adv., Mr. S.N. Terdal, AOR, Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, Adv., Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, Adv., Mr. Somanadri Gaud Katam, Adv. Maharashtra : Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv., Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv., Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Uttarakhand : Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv., Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Sikkim : Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv.,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....OR, Mr. Saksham Garg, Adv., Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, AOR, Mr. Ashish Batra, AOR, Ms. Rooh-e-hina Dua, AOR, Mr. Aditya Jain, AOR, Mr. Malak Bhatt, AOR, Mr. Gaurav Mehrotra, Adv., Mr. Nadeem Murtaza, Adv., Mr. Sheeran Mohiuddin Alavi, Adv., Mr. Paawan Awasthi, Adv., Mr. Prashast Puri, Adv., Mr. Nikhil Jain, AOR, Ms. Anzu. K. Varkey, AOR ORDER I.A. NOS. 59555/2023-FOR INTERVENTION, 59556/2023- FOR DIRECTIONS, 69359/2023-INTERVENTION, 69362/2023 - FOR DIRECTION, 72515/2023 -INTERVENTION, 72521/2023-DIRECTIONS, 56135/2023-INTERVENTION, 51653/2023-INTERVENTION, 72281/2023-INTERVENTION 72282/2023-DIRECTIONS, 81454/2023-INTERVENTION, 81462/2023-DIRECTIONS, 82753/2023-INTERVENTION, 74225/2023-INTERVENTION IN MA No. 2034/2022 We are not inclined to entertain these applications in individual cases where it has been stated that the judgment in the present case is not being followed. The remedy really lies in pointing out the judgment of this Court and inviting an order from the Court concerned and if still it is perceived that the judgment is being followed in breach, to agitate their rights in independent proceedings. We also make it clear that henceforth we will not entertain any such ap....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....being passed by judicial officers, not in conformity with the judgment passed in the present matter. We call upon the Allahabad High Court to file appropriate affidavit within four weeks with advance copy to the learned Amicus setting out the steps taken in this regard and as to whether it has been identified if some judicial officers have been still frequently passing orders not in conformity with the judgment and whether any of the officers have been sent to the judicial academies for further upgradation of their skills. We may also note that as per some orders handed over to the learned Amicus, even after the last order, such orders as have been illustratively passed by the Lucknow and Ghaziabad Courts are not following the judgment of this Court. We would like to emphasize that if counsels want to bring to the notice of the Court that such orders are being passed, the least which is expected is that the Amicus would have been handed over advance copies of such orders to facilitate him in assisting the Court. One of the orders pointed out is of Sessions Judge, Lucknow in Bail Application [Under Section 438, Cr.P.C.] No.3704/2023 dated 26.04.2023 i.e. even after the order pass....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....behalf. (iv) In pursuance to the details of UTs given to NALSA, by Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, learned Amicus Curiae for NALSA submits that steps are being taken and some more time may be given for the follow up action in this behalf by NALSA and the State Legal Services Authorities. (v) A chart has been placed before us which shows that some of the States/UTs are yet to file the compliance report (para [73(d)]. We cannot appreciate the non-compliance by the States i.e. Karnataka, Telangana, Haryana Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshdweep. Not only is it to be filed but copies have to be supplied so that the counsels assisting us are able to carry out their task. (vi) Another issue flagged by Mr. Luthra is there are States which have filed affidavits but not supplied /filed standing orders i.e. Tamil Nadu, Assam, UT of Puducherry, Kerala and Odisha. We direct the States to supply copy of standing orders within two weeks from today failing which their Home Secretaries will remain present in Court as nothing seems to work except the peremptory orders of this nature. (vii) The third category is of States which have passed standing orders but not in not in conformity with the....