https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310903 The dominant issue was non-compliance by certain States in specified districts with SC directions governing anticipatory bail matters. SC held that its earlier order dated 21.03.2023 had unequivocally clarified that the directions applied to anticipatory bail cases, negating any plea of confusion. On that basis, SC directed the States to supply copies of relevant standing orders within two weeks, failing which their Home Secretaries were required to remain personally present before the Court, and the matter was listed for further compliance. en-us Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Dec 2025 16:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310903 The dominant issue was non-compliance by certain States in specified districts with SC directions governing anticipatory bail matters. SC held that its earlier order dated 21.03.2023 had unequivocally clarified that the directions applied to anticipatory bail cases, negating any plea of confusion. On that basis, SC directed the States to supply copies of relevant standing orders within two weeks, failing which their Home Secretaries were required to remain personally present before the Court, and the matter was listed for further compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310903