Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (6) TMI 201

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ity in the impugned order held that the towers constituted essential components of windmills and hence classifiable under SH 8412.90 of the CETA Schedule attracting the benefit of the above Notification. According to the Revenue, the towers are iron or steel structures appropriately classifiable under SH 7308.20. 2. The learned SDR reiterates the grounds of this appeal with special focus on Ground No.1, which reads "the goods cleared from the factory were only towers and towers are specifically covered under Chapter Heading 7308.20". The learned counsel for the respondents relies on the following two decisions of the Tribunal in support of the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) (i) Commissioner v. Techno Fab Manufacturing Ltd. - 2003....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t appears from the facts of this case that the iron/steel towers in question were manufactured in the respondent's factory and cleared in SKD/CKD condition (without payment of duty) to the buyer's sites, where the towers were erected and the remaining parts of windmill mounted thereon. These remaining parts of the windmill were not manufactured or supplied by the respondents. In other words, the goods cleared from the respondent's factory were only towers, which are treated by them as parts of windmills and by the Revenue as mere towers classifiable under SH 7308.20. It appears from the description of goods given at Sl. No.18 of the Notification that exemption from payment of duty was extended to those parts which were manufactured and capt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the towers manufactured and cleared from the respondent's factory were used by their buyers as parts of windmills. But this is not enough. For claiming exemption from payment of duty on the towers, these items should have been cleared as parts of windmills. In other words, the towers should have been involved in the manufacture and clearance of windmills in SKD/CKD condition or otherwise. The above Notification was, purportedly, to benefit those manufacturers who manufactured non-conventional energy producing devices as complete machines and cleared the same in SKD/CKD condition or otherwise. This position is abundantly clear from S. Nos.1 to 17 of the Table annexed to the Notification. Sl. No.18 was so worded as to enable such manufactu....