Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 624

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Amit Kr. Sharma, CA For the Revenue : Shri Kanv Bali, Sr. DR ORDER PER BENCH:- The present appeals have been filed by assessee against the orders of ld. CIT(A)-29, New Delhi, dated 24.03.2023 for A.Ys. 2010-11 to 2015-16. 2. Since, the issues involved in all these appeals are similar, they were heard together and being adjudicated by a common order. 3. In ITA No. 1317/Del/2023, f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts and in law, in confirming the penalty and rejecting the contention of the assessee that on an addition made on the basis of estimation no penalty under section 271(1)(c) can be levied. 5. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT (A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming penalty levied by the AO despite the fact that the addition itself is not tenable in la....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he AO rejecting the contention of the assessee that penalty was levied without giving finding on merits of the case as concealment of income as well as furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. 9. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in levying penalty despite the fact that there is neither concealment of income nor furnis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: CIT vs. Manjunatha Cotton and Ginning Factory: 359 ITR 565 held that notice under section 274 should specifically state the grounds mentioned in section 271(1)(c) of the Act, i.e., whether it is for concealment of income or for furnishing of incorrect particulars of income. Sending printed form where all the grounds mentioned in section 271 are mentioned would not satisfy requirement of law. ....