<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 624 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444401</link>
    <description>The appeal against the orders of the ld. CIT(A) for A.Ys. 2010-11 to 2015-16 was successful. The orders passed by the Learned CIT(A) were challenged, and the appeal was allowed with the orders being obliterated. Penalties under section 271(1)(c) were also obliterated as the AO did not specify the charges against the assessee. The judgment emphasized that penalties cannot be confirmed if the charge is not specified, aligning with legal principles established by various High Courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 624 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444401</link>
      <description>The appeal against the orders of the ld. CIT(A) for A.Ys. 2010-11 to 2015-16 was successful. The orders passed by the Learned CIT(A) were challenged, and the appeal was allowed with the orders being obliterated. Penalties under section 271(1)(c) were also obliterated as the AO did not specify the charges against the assessee. The judgment emphasized that penalties cannot be confirmed if the charge is not specified, aligning with legal principles established by various High Courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>