Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 516

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....horana, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Sanjeev Menon, Jr Standing Counsel. ORDER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: 1. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 1994-95. Via the instant appeal, the appellant/assessee seeks to assail the order dated 28.04.2006 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, "Tribunal"] in ITA No.5489/Del/97. 1.1 The impugne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ture?" 3. We have dealt with pari materia substantial questions of law while deciding ITA No.1398/2006, concerning AY 1992-93, which was treated as the lead matter with the consent of counsels for the parties. 4. We may note that the only difference that obtains in the questions of law framed in ITA No.1398/2006 concerns the quantum of fees paid to the consultant. 4.1. In the instant AY, i.e.,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llowed, as capital expenditure. 6. Insofar as the payment of fees to GEL amounting to Rs.44,00,000/- was concerned, the CIT(A) sustained the disallowance made by the AO. 7. Upon the matter travelling to the Tribunal, it disallowed the entire expenditure on "repairs and renovation" amounting to Rs.13,30,93,811/- [Rs.3,48,92,811/- + Rs.982,01,000/-] (which included expenses that had been initially....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f fees to GEL. 9.1 Insofar as the amount of Rs. 982,01,000/- is concerned, which was initially capitalized and was claimed as revenue expenditure for the first time before the Tribunal and forms part of the additional grounds raised by the appellant/assessee in its appeal preferred before the Tribunal, it would stand remanded to the AO for examination of the character and nature of the expenses ....