<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 516 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444293</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant/assessee, holding that expenses on renovation, refurbishment, and repairs, as well as fees paid to the consultant, were revenue expenditures. The Court allowed deductions for these expenses but remanded the issue of initially capitalized expenses for further examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:31:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 516 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444293</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant/assessee, holding that expenses on renovation, refurbishment, and repairs, as well as fees paid to the consultant, were revenue expenditures. The Court allowed deductions for these expenses but remanded the issue of initially capitalized expenses for further examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>