Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 435

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amurthy For the Respondent : Mr.K.Mohana Murali Senior Panel Counsel ORDER Mr.K.Mohana Murali, learned Senior Panel Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned Order-in-Original No.18/2023(AC)(S.Tax) dated 31.03.2023 passed by the respondent and the consequential Demand Notice dated 04.07.2023 issued by the Superintendent, Range-II, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was under a bona fide belief that the petitioner was not liable to pay tax as the services provided by the petitioner to the recipient is liable to tax on reverse charge basis and therefore, the service tax liability is to be borne by the recipient of service. 7. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the service tax department. It is further submitted that even if the petitioner was not liable to pay tax that has been stated by the petitioner, the petitioner was required to register himself before the service tax department and ought to have filed nil returns, if no tax was payable in terms of Notification No.30/2012-Service Tax (S.T.) dated 20.06.2012 with effect from 01.07.2012. 11. That ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ay tax, and that, the recipient of service alone was liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis as is specified in Notification No.30/2012-Service Tax (S.T.) dated 20.06.2012. 15. The petitioner has not received any of the notices, which preceded the impugned order and thus, the petitioner had failed to participate in the proceedings. 16. Although the respondent cannot be faulted, the fact re....