<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 435 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444212</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order demanding Rs.19,73,486/- in service tax from the petitioner, a goods transport agency, due to lack of notice and opportunity to be heard. The case was remitted to the respondent for a fresh order within six months, treating the quashed order as a corrigendum to the Show Cause Notice. The petitioner must respond within thirty days. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 435 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444212</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order demanding Rs.19,73,486/- in service tax from the petitioner, a goods transport agency, due to lack of notice and opportunity to be heard. The case was remitted to the respondent for a fresh order within six months, treating the quashed order as a corrigendum to the Show Cause Notice. The petitioner must respond within thirty days. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>